Welcome on JurisPedia, an encyclopædic project of academic initiative devoted to worldwide law, legal and political sciences. You are invited to create an account and to contribute, by adding a new article or by modifying this one. There are currently 401 articles in permanent construction...

Negligence (uk)

From Jurispedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub about UK law. You can help Jurispedia by expanding it, or use the search tool...
UK law search
Google Custom Search

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland > Tort Law


Contents

Introduction

Negligence is a modern tort which has been developed by the Judiciary in the UK since the case of Donaghue v Stephenson[1] first distinguished this as a novel tort, distinct from contract law.

Negligence has since been split into several subsection listed below.


General Negligence

For an act to be proven negligent it is a requirement to show that;

1. A Duty of Care exists between the claimant and the defendant

2. There occured a clear breech of duty

3. Damage casued was of a foreseeable nature


Duty of Care

The original rule for defining duty of care was submitted alongside the ruling in Donaghue v Stephenson this stated that one should owe due consideration to one's neighbour, this being, those who are so closesly afected by one's actions that it is deemed that one ought to provide them with reasonable care and attention.

The "Neighbour Principle" was redefined in Caparo Industries v Dickman[2] when the current test was put forward. Duty of care is now defined by the following formula;

1. Was the damage to claimant reasonably forseeable?

2. Was the relationship between the claimant and the defednent sufficiently proximate?

3. Is it just and reasonable to impose a duty of care?

Notes and references

  1. Donaghue v Stephenson, [1932] AC 562
  2. Caparo Industries plc v. Dickman, [1990] 2 AC 605

See also

Personal tools